State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. Curl

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. Curl

712 N.E.2d 1254, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2297

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 22, 1999

Docket99-1344

StatusPublished

This text of 712 N.E.2d 1254 (State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. Curl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. Curl, 712 N.E.2d 1254, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2297 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In Prohibition and Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before August 11,1999; relator shall file his brief within ten days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file his brief within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Douglas, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause. See R.C. 2731.03. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would grant a peremptory writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition and Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before August 11,1999; relator shall file his brief within ten days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file his brief within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Douglas, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause. See R.C. 2731.03. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would grant a peremptory writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 N.E.2d 1254, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-state-fire-marshal-v-curl-ohio-1999.