State ex rel. State Banking Department v. Acadiana Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. State Banking Department v. Acadiana Bank & Trust Co.

360 So. 2d 846, 1978 La. LEXIS 5353

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 19, 1978

DocketNo. 61428

StatusPublished

This text of 360 So. 2d 846 (State ex rel. State Banking Department v. Acadiana Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. State Banking Department v. Acadiana Bank & Trust Co., 360 So. 2d 846, 1978 La. LEXIS 5353 (La. 1978).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held a portion of Act 98 of 1976¹ unconstitutional. This act, which prohibits bank institutions within nine parishes from opening on Saturdays, was held to violate the provision of La.Const. of 1974, Article 3, Section 12, which provides in pertinent part:

“Section 12. (A) Prohibitions. Except as otherwise provided in this constitution, the legislature shall not pass a local or special law: * * *

(6) Regulating labor, trade, manufacturing, or agriculture; fixing the rate of interest. * * * ”² (Italics ours.)

For reasons more fully set forth in our recent decision citing a similar issue, State v. LaBauve, 359 So.2d 181 (Docket No. 62,111, 1978), we find that the quoted portion of the act is a local law regulating trade in nine parishes by specific designation of them only. Therefore, it falls within the prohibition of Article 3, Section 12(A)(6) and is invalid.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court so declaring and, consequently, denying the state banking agency an injunction against the defendant bank to require it to close on Saturdays.

AFFIRMED.

MARCUS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and assigns reasons. SANDERS, C. J., concurs in part and dissents in part for the reasons assigned by MARCUS, J. SUMMERS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held a portion of Act 98 of 1976¹ unconstitutional. This act, which prohibits bank institutions within nine parishes from opening on Saturdays, was held to violate the provision of La.Const. of 1974, Article 3, Section 12, which provides in pertinent part:

“Section 12. (A) Prohibitions. Except as otherwise provided in this constitution, the legislature shall not pass a local or special law: * * *

(6) Regulating labor, trade, manufacturing, or agriculture; fixing the rate of interest. * * * ”² (Italics ours.)

For reasons more fully set forth in our recent decision citing a similar issue, State v. LaBauve, 359 So.2d 181 (Docket No. 62,111, 1978), we find that the quoted portion of the act is a local law regulating trade in nine parishes by specific designation of them only. Therefore, it falls within the prohibition of Article 3, Section 12(A)(6) and is invalid.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court so declaring and, consequently, denying the state banking agency an injunction against the defendant bank to require it to close on Saturdays.

AFFIRMED.

MARCUS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and assigns reasons. SANDERS, C. J., concurs in part and dissents in part for the reasons assigned by MARCUS, J. SUMMERS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

360 So. 2d 846, 1978 La. LEXIS 5353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-state-banking-department-v-acadiana-bank-trust-co-la-1978.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack