State ex rel. Starwood v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Starwood v. State

637 So. 2d 1056, 1994 La. LEXIS 1182, 1994 WL 173792

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 6, 1994·No. No. 94-KH-0989·Published

Opinion

In re Starwood, Ronald A.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, [1057]*1057No. KW94 0240; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 64158.

Writ denied. Premature. If either the district court or the First Circuit Court of Appeal grants relief after the district court evidentiary hearing the First Circuit ordered (in 94 KW 240 March 25, 1994), the review sought by this application may be rendered unnecessary. The right to petition anew for the relief now sought from this Court, in the event relator does not obtain adequate relief from the district court of the First Circuit, is reserved to relator.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Starwood, Ronald A.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, [1057]*1057No. KW94 0240; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 64158.

Writ denied. Premature. If either the district court or the First Circuit Court of Appeal grants relief after the district court evidentiary hearing the First Circuit ordered (in 94 KW 240 March 25, 1994), the review sought by this application may be rendered unnecessary. The right to petition anew for the relief now sought from this Court, in the event relator does not obtain adequate relief from the district court of the First Circuit, is reserved to relator.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

State ex rel. Starwood v. State, 637 So. 2d 1056, 1994 La. LEXIS 1182, 1994 WL 173792 (La. 1994).

Pincite

637 So. 2d 1056 (State ex rel. Starwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.