State ex rel. Stark v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Stark v. State

949 So. 2d 409, 2007 La. LEXIS 470

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 16, 2007

DocketNo. 2006-KH-1457

StatusPublished

This text of 949 So. 2d 409 (State ex rel. Stark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Stark v. State, 949 So. 2d 409, 2007 La. LEXIS 470 (La. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Stark, Edwin J.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 391-426; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2005-K-0588.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. Because R.S. 14:31(B) does not call for a prohibition on parole, probation, or suspension of sentence in the circumstances presented by relator’s case, relator’s sentence imposed under that statute is [410]*410amended to delete the prohibition. The district court is directed to make an entry in the minutes reflecting this change and the clerk of court is directed to transmit the original of the minute entry to officer in charge of the institution to which the defendant has been sentenced. La.C.Cr.P. art. 892(B)(2). In all other respects, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Stark, Edwin J.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 391-426; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2005-K-0588.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. Because R.S. 14:31(B) does not call for a prohibition on parole, probation, or suspension of sentence in the circumstances presented by relator’s case, relator’s sentence imposed under that statute is [410]*410amended to delete the prohibition. The district court is directed to make an entry in the minutes reflecting this change and the clerk of court is directed to transmit the original of the minute entry to officer in charge of the institution to which the defendant has been sentenced. La.C.Cr.P. art. 892(B)(2). In all other respects, the application is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

949 So. 2d 409, 2007 La. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-stark-v-state-la-2007.