State ex rel. Stansberry v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Stansberry v. State

520 So. 2d 756, 1988 La. LEXIS 715, 1988 WL 21093

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 11, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KH-0484

StatusPublished

This text of 520 So. 2d 756 (State ex rel. Stansberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Stansberry v. State, 520 So. 2d 756, 1988 La. LEXIS 715, 1988 WL 21093 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Stansberry, Johnny; applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or re[757]*757medial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 322-773.

Denied. In the event of conviction relator will have an adequate remedy on appeal, if as he alleges, the trial court denied him a fair opportunity to present his claims at the suppression hearing and thereby erroneously ruled against him on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Stansberry, Johnny; applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or re[757]*757medial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 322-773.

Denied. In the event of conviction relator will have an adequate remedy on appeal, if as he alleges, the trial court denied him a fair opportunity to present his claims at the suppression hearing and thereby erroneously ruled against him on the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 So. 2d 756, 1988 La. LEXIS 715, 1988 WL 21093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-stansberry-v-state-la-1988.