State ex rel. Stamm v. Harm & Ring Mechanical, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Stamm v. Harm & Ring Mechanical, Inc.

112 Ohio St. 3d 545

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 14, 2007·No. No. 2006-1326·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the Industrial Commission. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Sue A. Wetzel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the Industrial Commission. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Sue A. Wetzel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

State ex rel. Stamm v. Harm & Ring Mechanical, Inc., 112 Ohio St. 3d 545 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

112 Ohio St. 3d 545 (State ex rel. Stamm v. Harm & Ring Mechanical, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.