State ex rel. Stamm v. Harm & Ring Mechanical, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Stamm v. Harm & Ring Mechanical, Inc.

112 Ohio St. 3d 545

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 14, 2007

DocketNo. 2006-1326

StatusPublished

This text of 112 Ohio St. 3d 545 (State ex rel. Stamm v. Harm & Ring Mechanical, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Stamm v. Harm & Ring Mechanical, Inc., 112 Ohio St. 3d 545 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the Industrial Commission. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Sue A. Wetzel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the Industrial Commission. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Sue A. Wetzel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 Ohio St. 3d 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-stamm-v-harm-ring-mechanical-inc-ohio-2007.