State Ex Rel. Sprague, Co. v. One Pin Ball MacHine Styled" Nevada"
This text of 1950 OK 312 (State Ex Rel. Sprague, Co. v. One Pin Ball MacHine Styled" Nevada") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I. C. Sprague, county attorney, as relator, brought a proceeding in the name of the State of Oklahoma to confiscate a pin ball machine styled “Nevada”.
Buck Graves, Ben Williams, and the owner or owners of the pin ball machine were notified of the application to confiscate and Buck Graves filed an answer claiming ownership of the machine.
Following a proceeding to determine the issue involved, the trial judge entered an order denying confiscation and further ordering delivery of the possession of said pin ball machine styled “Nevada” to Buck Graves, intervener.
The relator has duly perfected the appeal and, on December 7, 1949, filed a brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably support the allegations of error. Intervener, Buck Graves, has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court *653 but the cause will be reversed and remanded with directions.
The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate its order in favor of intervener, Buck Graves, and to enter a judgment of confiscation in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1950 OK 312, 225 P.2d 369, 203 Okla. 652, 1950 Okla. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sprague-co-v-one-pin-ball-machine-styled-nevada-okla-1950.