State ex rel. Spitz v. Court of Appeal, First Circuit

637 So. 2d 149, 1994 La. LEXIS 1040, 1994 WL 146069
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 22, 1994·No. No. 94-KH-0792·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re Spitz, Raymond; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA93 2070; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 200821.

Granted in part; denied in part. The appellant is entitled to file a supplemental pro se brief and have the First circuit Court of Appeal consider it. See, State v. Smalley, 599 So.2d 1090 (La.1992). Otherwise, the relief sought is denied.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Spitz v. Court of Appeal, First Circuit, 637 So. 2d 149, 1994 La. LEXIS 1040, 1994 WL 146069 (La. 1994).

637 So. 2d 149 (State ex rel. Spitz v. Court of Appeal, First Circuit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallace v. Prince
975 F. Supp. 2d 574 (M.D. Louisiana, 2013)
State v. Melon
660 So. 2d 466 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)