State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm.

1999 Ohio 393, 85 Ohio St. 3d 377

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 28, 1999

Docket1998-1444

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 393 (State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm., 1999 Ohio 393, 85 Ohio St. 3d 377 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 377.]

THE STATE EX REL. SPINKS, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-393.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-1444—Submitted February 23, 1999—Decided April 28, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD03-326. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Gerald H. Waterman and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and PFEIFER, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 377.]

THE STATE EX REL. SPINKS, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Spinks v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-393.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-1444—Submitted February 23, 1999—Decided April 28, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD03-326. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Gerald H. Waterman and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and PFEIFER, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 393, 85 Ohio St. 3d 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-spinks-v-indus-comm-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack