State ex rel. Spillman v. Dannebrog State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

State ex rel. Spillman v. Dannebrog State Bank

228 N.W. 941, 119 Neb. 859, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 36

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided January 8, 1930·No. No. 26981·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

H. P. Petersen, appellee herein, filed a claim in the receivership proceedings brought to wind up the affairs of the Dannebrog State bank, based on two certificates of deposit in the amounts of $1,666.67 and $2,500, respectively. The district court for Howard county found the $1,666.67 item to be a general claim and the $2,500 item to be a preferred claim and allowed both as an off-set against a $7,000 note of Petersen and entered judgment in favor of the receiver of the Dannebrog State Bank and against Petersen for $4,384.66. The receiver has appealed.

We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

H. P. Petersen, appellee herein, filed a claim in the receivership proceedings brought to wind up the affairs of the Dannebrog State bank, based on two certificates of deposit in the amounts of $1,666.67 and $2,500, respectively. The district court for Howard county found the $1,666.67 item to be a general claim and the $2,500 item to be a preferred claim and allowed both as an off-set against a $7,000 note of Petersen and entered judgment in favor of the receiver of the Dannebrog State Bank and against Petersen for $4,384.66. The receiver has appealed.

We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

State ex rel. Spillman v. Dannebrog State Bank, 228 N.W. 941, 119 Neb. 859, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 36 (Neb. 1930).

Pincite

228 N.W. 941 (State ex rel. Spillman v. Dannebrog State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.