State ex rel. Spillman v. Clinton State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

State ex rel. Spillman v. Clinton State Bank

218 N.W. 96, 116 Neb. 484, 1928 Neb. LEXIS 137

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1928

DocketNo. 25344

StatusPublished

This text of 218 N.W. 96 (State ex rel. Spillman v. Clinton State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Spillman v. Clinton State Bank, 218 N.W. 96, 116 Neb. 484, 1928 Neb. LEXIS 137 (Neb. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Redick, District Judge.

Claim of George W. Caldwell, administrator, against the receiver of Clinton State Bank for the value of liberty bonds in the sum of $2,150, which were left in the bank for safe-keeping, by Mary J. Caldwell, since deceased. Upon demurrer of the receiver to the petition of claimant being overruled and judgment entered for claimant against the bank for the full amount and ordering the same paid out of the state guaranty fund, the receiver appeals.

The case is ruled by State v. Clinton State Bank, ante, p. 482.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the district court be reversed in so far as it orders the claim paid from the state guaranty fund,-and the cause remanded, with leave to claimant to file an amended petition claiming a preference' upon the assets of the bank, if advised that the facts warrant such claim; judgment allowing claim against the general assets.of the bank is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redick, District Judge.

Claim of George W. Caldwell, administrator, against the receiver of Clinton State Bank for the value of liberty bonds in the sum of $2,150, which were left in the bank for safe-keeping, by Mary J. Caldwell, since deceased. Upon demurrer of the receiver to the petition of claimant being overruled and judgment entered for claimant against the bank for the full amount and ordering the same paid out of the state guaranty fund, the receiver appeals.

The case is ruled by State v. Clinton State Bank, ante, p. 482.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the district court be reversed in so far as it orders the claim paid from the state guaranty fund,-and the cause remanded, with leave to claimant to file an amended petition claiming a preference' upon the assets of the bank, if advised that the facts warrant such claim; judgment allowing claim against the general assets.of the bank is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 N.W. 96, 116 Neb. 484, 1928 Neb. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-spillman-v-clinton-state-bank-neb-1928.