State ex rel. Spengler v. Buckeye Bd. of Edn.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Spengler v. Buckeye Bd. of Edn.

93 Ohio St. 3d 1303

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 1, 2001

Docket01-963

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1303 (State ex rel. Spengler v. Buckeye Bd. of Edn.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Spengler v. Buckeye Bd. of Edn., 93 Ohio St. 3d 1303 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. A telephone mediation conference was scheduled for July 27, 2001. Whereas respondents have neither filed an application for dismissal nor requested that the case proceed before this court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondents show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this case should not be returned to the regular- docket and proceed before the court on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. A telephone mediation conference was scheduled for July 27, 2001. Whereas respondents have neither filed an application for dismissal nor requested that the case proceed before this court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondents show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this case should not be returned to the regular- docket and proceed before the court on the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-spengler-v-buckeye-bd-of-edn-ohio-2001.