State ex rel. Spellman v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Spellman v. State

219 So. 3d 326, 2017 La. LEXIS 1039

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 12, 2017

DocketNo. 16-KH-0098

StatusPublished

This text of 219 So. 3d 326 (State ex rel. Spellman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Spellman v. State, 219 So. 3d 326, 2017 La. LEXIS 1039 (La. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

| ^Denied. Relator’s sentencing claim is not cognizable oh collateral review/ La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See, e.g., State ex rel. [327]*327Spellman v. State, 15-1255 (La. 1/15/16), 182 So.3d 963; State ex rel. Spellman v. State, 15-1613 (La. 1/15/16), 182 So.3d 963.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

| ^Denied. Relator’s sentencing claim is not cognizable oh collateral review/ La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See, e.g., State ex rel. [327]*327Spellman v. State, 15-1255 (La. 1/15/16), 182 So.3d 963; State ex rel. Spellman v. State, 15-1613 (La. 1/15/16), 182 So.3d 963.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 So. 3d 326, 2017 La. LEXIS 1039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-spellman-v-state-la-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack