State ex rel. Spellman v. State
219 So. 3d 326, 2017 La. LEXIS 1039
Opinion
| ^Denied. Relator’s sentencing claim is not cognizable oh collateral review/ La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See, e.g., State ex rel. [327] Spellman v. State, 15-1255 (La. 1/15/16), 182 So.3d 963; State ex rel. Spellman v. State, 15-1613 (La. 1/15/16), 182 So.3d 963.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Spellman v. State, 219 So. 3d 326, 2017 La. LEXIS 1039 (La. 2017).
219 So. 3d 326 (State ex rel. Spellman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State
665 So. 2d 1172 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
State ex rel. Spellman v. State
182 So. 3d 963 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2016)
State v. Cotton
45 So. 3d 1030 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)