State ex rel. Speakman v. Ranco, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Speakman v. Ranco, Inc.

2000 Ohio 304, 88 Ohio St. 3d 225

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 21, 2000

Docket1998-1635

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 304 (State ex rel. Speakman v. Ranco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Speakman v. Ranco, Inc., 2000 Ohio 304, 88 Ohio St. 3d 225 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 225.]

THE STATE EX REL. SPEAKMAN, APPELLANT, v. RANCO, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Speakman v. Ranco, Inc., 2000-Ohio-304.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-1635—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD06-827. __________________ Stanley R. Jurus Law Offices and Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., Thomas M. Taggart and Theodore P. Mattis, for appellee Ranco, Inc. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J., McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., separately dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 225.]

THE STATE EX REL. SPEAKMAN, APPELLANT, v. RANCO, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Speakman v. Ranco, Inc., 2000-Ohio-304.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-1635—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD06-827. __________________ Stanley R. Jurus Law Offices and Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., Thomas M. Taggart and Theodore P. Mattis, for appellee Ranco, Inc. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J., McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., separately dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 304, 88 Ohio St. 3d 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-speakman-v-ranco-inc-ohio-2000.