State ex rel. Spaulding v. Board of County Commissioners
This text of 150 P. 1198 (State ex rel. Spaulding v. Board of County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that A. M. Morse, one of the respondents herein, is not a necessary or proper party to this proceeding, it is ordered that the proceedings as to him he dismissed. It further appearing from its answer herein that the respondent board of county commissioners has fully complied with the demands of the alternative writ, it is ordered that the proceedings as to the hoard be also dismissed and that the relator have and recover his costs as against the board. The respondent Morse is entitled to recover his costs of relator.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 P. 1198, 50 Mont. 594, 1915 Mont. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-spaulding-v-board-of-county-commissioners-mont-1915.