State ex rel. Spaulding v. Board of County Commissioners

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Spaulding v. Board of County Commissioners

150 P. 1198, 50 Mont. 594, 1915 Mont. LEXIS 58

Montana Supreme Court·Decided January 18, 1915·No. No. 3,604·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that A. M. Morse, one of the respondents herein, is not a necessary or proper party to this proceeding, it is ordered that the proceedings as to him he dismissed. It further appearing from its answer herein that the respondent board of county commissioners has fully complied with the demands of the alternative writ, it is ordered that the proceedings as to the hoard be also dismissed and that the relator have and recover his costs as against the board. The respondent Morse is entitled to recover his costs of relator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that A. M. Morse, one of the respondents herein, is not a necessary or proper party to this proceeding, it is ordered that the proceedings as to him he dismissed. It further appearing from its answer herein that the respondent board of county commissioners has fully complied with the demands of the alternative writ, it is ordered that the proceedings as to the hoard be also dismissed and that the relator have and recover his costs as against the board. The respondent Morse is entitled to recover his costs of relator.

State ex rel. Spaulding v. Board of County Commissioners, 150 P. 1198, 50 Mont. 594, 1915 Mont. LEXIS 58 (Mo. 1915).

Pincite

150 P. 1198 (State ex rel. Spaulding v. Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.