State ex rel. Somerville v. Conrad

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Somerville v. Conrad

1999 Ohio 226, 87 Ohio St. 3d 46

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 13, 1999

Docket1999-0154

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 226 (State ex rel. Somerville v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Somerville v. Conrad, 1999 Ohio 226, 87 Ohio St. 3d 46 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 46.]

THE STATE EX REL. SOMERVILLE, APPELLANT, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL.; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Somerville v. Conrad, 1999-Ohio-226.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-154—Submitted August 25, 1999—Decided October 13, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD12-1621. __________________ Urban Co., L.P.A., and Anthony P. Christine, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steve P. Dlott, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 46.]

THE STATE EX REL. SOMERVILLE, APPELLANT, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL.; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Somerville v. Conrad, 1999-Ohio-226.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-154—Submitted August 25, 1999—Decided October 13, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD12-1621. __________________ Urban Co., L.P.A., and Anthony P. Christine, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steve P. Dlott, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 226, 87 Ohio St. 3d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-somerville-v-conrad-ohio-1999.