State ex rel. Snyder v. Cunningham

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Snyder v. Cunningham

692 N.E.2d 1022, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1519, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1545

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 23, 1998

Docket98-357

StatusPublished

This text of 692 N.E.2d 1022 (State ex rel. Snyder v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Snyder v. Cunningham, 692 N.E.2d 1022, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1519, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1545 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On March 16,1998, respondents filed a response to relator’s motion for peremptory writ that was due March 2, 1998. S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing a document that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondents’ response to relator’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On March 16,1998, respondents filed a response to relator’s motion for peremptory writ that was due March 2, 1998. S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing a document that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondents’ response to relator’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

692 N.E.2d 1022, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1519, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-snyder-v-cunningham-ohio-1998.