State ex rel. Smith v. Whitley

589 So. 2d 481, 1991 La. LEXIS 3162, 1991 WL 242006
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Smith v. Whitley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 La. LEXIS 3903
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 11, 1991·No. No. 91-KH-2542·Published

Opinion

In re Smith, James Edward; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial and writ of mandamus; Parish of Tangipa-[482]*482hoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. A , No. 42,077.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he has filed on or about February 11,1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Smith v. Whitley, 589 So. 2d 481, 1991 La. LEXIS 3162, 1991 WL 242006 (La. 1991).

589 So. 2d 481 (State ex rel. Smith v. Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.