State ex rel. Smith v. Whitley
Opinion
In re Smith, James Edward; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial and writ of mandamus; Parish of Tangipa-[482]*482hoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. A , No. 42,077.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he has filed on or about February 11,1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
589 So. 2d 481 (State ex rel. Smith v. Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.