State ex rel. Smith v. Thomas

130 N.E. 121, 190 Ind. 237, 1921 Ind. LEXIS 93
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 10, 1921
DocketNo. 23,470
StatusPublished

This text of 130 N.E. 121 (State ex rel. Smith v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Smith v. Thomas, 130 N.E. 121, 190 Ind. 237, 1921 Ind. LEXIS 93 (Ind. 1921).

Opinion

Ewbank, J.

— The relator and the appellee, and another, were rival candidates for the office of clerk-treasurer of the town of Woodruff Place, at the town election in November, 1917. The relator and appellee each received an equal number of votes, receiving two votes apiece more than the third candidate. The inspector of the one precinct in Woodruff Place cast lots as between the relator and appellee, and declared that the relator was elected. But the appellee, whose former term as clerk-treasurer of the town was expiring, refused to surrender the office, insisting that there had been no election of his successor, and that he was entitled to continue in office until a clerk-treasurer should be chosen at a special election. The superior court sustained a demurrer to the complaint by the relator, alleging . such facts, and, upon his refusal to plead over, rendered final judgment in favor of the appellee, from which this appeal' was taken.

The only question for decision is whether, in case of a tie vote at a town election, the right to the office shall be determined by casting lots, where the town has long been incorporated, and its full complement of officers are serving, as well as at the first election, and whether the candidate in whose favor the lot is cast in such a case is entitled to the office.

This precise question was decided by this court in the recent case of Arnold v. State, ex rel. (1919), 188 Ind. 222, 122 N. E. 769, and on the authority of that decision the judgment is reversed, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the complaint, and for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion in said case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. State ex rel. Davis
122 N.E. 769 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 N.E. 121, 190 Ind. 237, 1921 Ind. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-smith-v-thomas-ind-1921.