State ex rel. Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Smith v. State

558 So. 2d 561, 1990 La. LEXIS 557, 1990 WL 26174

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 9, 1990·No. No. 89-KH-2476·Published

Opinion

In re Smith, Dóile H.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs and writ of mandamus; Parish of Bossier, Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 60-639; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 21441-KH.

Granted. The fine and default provision of relator’s sentence are amended to add the words: “unless defendant is at that time indigent”.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Smith, Dóile H.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs and writ of mandamus; Parish of Bossier, Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 60-639; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 21441-KH.

Granted. The fine and default provision of relator’s sentence are amended to add the words: “unless defendant is at that time indigent”.

State ex rel. Smith v. State, 558 So. 2d 561, 1990 La. LEXIS 557, 1990 WL 26174 (La. 1990).

Pincite

558 So. 2d 561 (State ex rel. Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.