State ex rel. Smith v. McGraw-Edison Co.

664 N.E.2d 1292, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1495
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 29, 1996
Docket95-2051
StatusPublished

This text of 664 N.E.2d 1292 (State ex rel. Smith v. McGraw-Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Smith v. McGraw-Edison Co., 664 N.E.2d 1292, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to expedite. Motion denied; sua sponte, oral argument denied.

Douglas, J., would deny the motion to expedite but grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 N.E.2d 1292, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-smith-v-mcgraw-edison-co-ohio-1996.