State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm.

2000 Ohio 306, 88 Ohio St. 3d 226
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 21, 2000·No. 1999-0112·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 226.]

THE STATE EX REL. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

[Cite as State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-306.]

Workers compensation—Judgment affirmed.

(No. 99-112—Submitted February 23, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD12-1666.

Marchese & Monast and Thomas J. Marchese, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jon D. Grandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} On authority of State ex rel. Hoskins v. Indus. Comm. (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 560, 722 N.E.2d 66, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 306, 88 Ohio St. 3d 226 (Ohio 2000).

2000 Ohio 306 (State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Hoskins v. Industrial Commission
722 N.E.2d 66 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
State ex rel. Smith v. Industrial Commission
724 N.E.2d 1143 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
State ex rel. Hoskins v. Indus. Comm.
2000 Ohio 484 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)