State ex rel. Smith v. Hopkins

Delaware Court of Common Pleas

State ex rel. Smith v. Hopkins

1 Del. Cas. 548

DecidedApril 15, 1818

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 548 (State ex rel. Smith v. Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Smith v. Hopkins, 1 Del. Cas. 548 (Del. Super. Ct. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It may be doubted whether this case is within the words of the Act, 1 Del. Laws 420, but we consider it within the equity of the Act. We are not inclined to narrow the security the law intended to afford to the estates of deceased persons. The probate must be made by the legatees, who are the real plaintiffs in the cause. It will, however, be sufficient if the probate is now made, as it may be exhibited in any stage of the cause before the nonsuit takes place.. Upon the second point, the Court are equally divided and no opinion can be given.

A probate was then made by Obadiah Smith, one of the legatees, and offered to the jury.

The defendant contended that O. Smith and P. Smith, having elected to join in the scire facias, must stand or fall together.

The interests of the legatees continue several and distinct, notwithstanding they have joined in the scire facias. It is irregular, but it is every day’s practice.

Nonsuit as to P. Smith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It may be doubted whether this case is within the words of the Act, 1 Del. Laws 420, but we consider it within the equity of the Act. We are not inclined to narrow the security the law intended to afford to the estates of deceased persons. The probate must be made by the legatees, who are the real plaintiffs in the cause. It will, however, be sufficient if the probate is now made, as it may be exhibited in any stage of the cause before the nonsuit takes place.. Upon the second point, the Court are equally divided and no opinion can be given.

A probate was then made by Obadiah Smith, one of the legatees, and offered to the jury.

The defendant contended that O. Smith and P. Smith, having elected to join in the scire facias, must stand or fall together.

The interests of the legatees continue several and distinct, notwithstanding they have joined in the scire facias. It is irregular, but it is every day’s practice.

Nonsuit as to P. Smith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. Cas. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-smith-v-hopkins-delctcompl-1818.