State ex rel. Smith v. Hoffman

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Smith v. Hoffman

209 N.E.2d 214, 3 Ohio St. 2d 95, 32 Ohio Op. 2d 65, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 454

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 7, 1965

DocketNo. 39427

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 N.E.2d 214 (State ex rel. Smith v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Smith v. Hoffman, 209 N.E.2d 214, 3 Ohio St. 2d 95, 32 Ohio Op. 2d 65, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 454 (Ohio 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court in its discretion will ordinarily

refuse to issue a writ of mandamus where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St. 302. Relator may bring an action at law against the city in the Court of Common Pleas to recover the compensation he alleges that he is entitled to for official services rendered to the municipal corporation. Gobrecht v. Cincinnati, 51 Ohio St. 68.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI