State ex rel. Smith v. District Court of Seventh Judicial District

826 P.2d 1122, 1992 Wyo. LEXIS 29, 1992 WL 35381
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1992
DocketNo. 91-252
StatusPublished

This text of 826 P.2d 1122 (State ex rel. Smith v. District Court of Seventh Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Smith v. District Court of Seventh Judicial District, 826 P.2d 1122, 1992 Wyo. LEXIS 29, 1992 WL 35381 (Wyo. 1992).

Opinions

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

This matter came before the Court upon a Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Defendant’s Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibition together with Petitioner’s Addendum of Exhibits filed herein on behalf of the Petitioner on November 27, 1991, and Response in Opposition to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Respondent’s Brief Opposing Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Prohibition, filed herein on behalf of the Respondents on December 19, 1991, and the Court, having examined the pleadings together with the exhibits incorporated therein, and being fully informed in the premises, finds that the Petition for Writ of Prohibition seeks a review in Criminal Action No. 11354, State of Wyoming v. Teresa Smith, now pending in the District Court, Seventh Judicial District in and for Natrona County, and asserts that the District Court lacks jurisdiction on the ground of double jeopardy; the Petition and Brief do not identify any action which the law specifically enjoins as a duty of the district court or a judge thereof; they do not advise this court as to the absence of any adequate remedy at law; it appears that the right of appeal from any final order or judgment is an adequate remedy; and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition should be denied; and it, therefore, is

ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Prohibition be, and the same hereby is, denied.

URBIGKIT, C.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartkus v. Illinois
359 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1959)
North Carolina v. Pearce
395 U.S. 711 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Ashe v. Swenson
397 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Brown v. Ohio
432 U.S. 161 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Harris v. Oklahoma
433 U.S. 682 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Missouri v. Hunter
459 U.S. 359 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Grady v. Corbin
495 U.S. 508 (Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 P.2d 1122, 1992 Wyo. LEXIS 29, 1992 WL 35381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-smith-v-district-court-of-seventh-judicial-district-wyo-1992.