State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson

780 N.E.2d 284, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1479

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Ohio St. 3d 1425 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 2002·No. 2002-1672·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss of Max Rothal, John York, Patrick and Brian Armstead, and Bryan Jividen, motion for sanctions for frivolous action of Max Rothal, John York, Patrick and Brian Armstead, and Bryan Jividen, motion to dismiss of Perry Dickinson and motion for sanction and an award of attorney fees, and motion to strike motion to dismiss and motion for sanctions and award of attorney fees of Perry Dickinson. Motions to dismiss granted and motions for sanctions and for award of attorney fees granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss of Max Rothal, John York, Patrick and Brian Armstead, and Bryan Jividen, motion for sanctions for frivolous action of Max Rothal, John York, Patrick and Brian Armstead, and Bryan Jividen, motion to dismiss of Perry Dickinson and motion for sanction and an award of attorney fees, and motion to strike motion to dismiss and motion for sanctions and award of attorney fees of Perry Dickinson. Motions to dismiss granted and motions for sanctions and for award of attorney fees granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson, 780 N.E.2d 284, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1479 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

780 N.E.2d 284 (State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.