Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson

State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson

780 N.E.2d 284, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1479
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 18, 2002
Docket2002-1672
StatusPublished

This text of 780 N.E.2d 284 (State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Smith v. Dickinson, 780 N.E.2d 284, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1479 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss of Max Rothal, John York, Patrick and Brian Armstead, and Bryan Jividen, motion for sanctions for frivolous action of Max Rothal, John York, Patrick and Brian Armstead, and Bryan Jividen, motion to dismiss of Perry Dickinson and motion for sanction and an award of attorney fees, and motion to strike motion to dismiss and motion for sanctions and award of attorney fees of Perry Dickinson. Motions to dismiss granted and motions for sanctions and for award of attorney fees granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
780 N.E.2d 284, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-smith-v-dickinson-ohio-2002.