State ex rel. Smith v. Daniels

136 N.W. 587, 118 Minn. 527, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 622
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Smith v. Daniels. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 Minn. 155
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 7, 1912·No. Nos. 17,653—(20)·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This ease, argued and submitted with that of State v. Daniels, supra, page 155, 136 N. W. 584, must also be affirmed.

In the instant case the criminal proceeding is sought to be based on section 5173, R. L. 1905, which makes it a gross misdemeanor to require or demand that an employee surrender any natural right, or any right, or privilege of citizenship. But the warrant and complaint designate the right or privilege which relator required the employee to surrender to be that of his membership in a labor organization, thus bringing the prosecution within section 5097, R. L. 1905.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Smith v. Daniels, 136 N.W. 587, 118 Minn. 527, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 622 (Mich. 1912).

136 N.W. 587 (State ex rel. Smith v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Smith v. Daniels
136 N.W. 584 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1912)