State ex rel. Slager v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Slager v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2 N.E.3d 266, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1471

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 22, 2014

Docket2013-1815

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.E.3d 266 (State ex rel. Slager v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Slager v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2 N.E.3d 266, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. An alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days after the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

It is further ordered by the court that relator’s motion for notification is denied as moot.

Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell and French, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. An alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days after the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

It is further ordered by the court that relator’s motion for notification is denied as moot.

Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell and French, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.E.3d 266, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-slager-v-ohio-dept-of-rehab-corr-ohio-2014.