State Ex Rel. Skinner v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Skinner v. Adams

190 So. 491, 139 Fla. 140, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1636

DecidedJuly 7, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 491 (State Ex Rel. Skinner v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Skinner v. Adams, 190 So. 491, 139 Fla. 140, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1636 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a mandamus proceeding to require the Florida State Board of Architecture to Issue relator a certificate as a Registered Architect under the Laws of Florida. There was a motion to quash the alternative writ. Arguments w'ere heard which, with briefs and the pleadings, have been considered. Mr. Justices Whitfield, Terrell, and Ci-iapman think the motion to quash should be granted while Mr. Justices Brown, Buford and Ti-iomas are of the opinion that it should be denied. Being an original proceeding in this Court and the Court being equally divided and there being no prospect of an immediate change in the Court, the motion to quash is denied and proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a mandamus proceeding to require the Florida State Board of Architecture to Issue relator a certificate as a Registered Architect under the Laws of Florida. There was a motion to quash the alternative writ. Arguments w'ere heard which, with briefs and the pleadings, have been considered. Mr. Justices Whitfield, Terrell, and Ci-iapman think the motion to quash should be granted while Mr. Justices Brown, Buford and Ti-iomas are of the opinion that it should be denied. Being an original proceeding in this Court and the Court being equally divided and there being no prospect of an immediate change in the Court, the motion to quash is denied and proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 491, 139 Fla. 140, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-skinner-v-adams-fla-1939.