State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of Dover

130 N.W. 74, 113 Minn. 452, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 788
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 17, 1911
DocketNos. 16,764—(42)
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 130 N.W. 74 (State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of Dover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of Dover, 130 N.W. 74, 113 Minn. 452, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 788 (Mich. 1911).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

This proceeding was commenced to test the validity of the incorporation of the village of Dover. The territory is one mile square, and includes the east quarter of section 21 and the west three quarters of section 22, in Dover township, Olmsted county. At the time of incorporation, in December, 1908, the platted portion comprised seventy-five acres in a compact body, as will appear from the plat. The' unplatted portion consists of five hundred sixty-five acres, mostly to the south and east of the village proper. To be more accurate, it is about one hundred sixty rods from Oak street to the east line of the corporation, and about two hundred rods from the south line of the platted part to the south line of the corporation; whereas, it is only about forty rods from Sheek street on the west to the west line, and a like distance between the northernmost platted part and the north line. The unplatted portion to the northeast and to the east and south is suitable and used for agricultural purposes.

Thp village proper is divided by the Chicago & Great Western Railway, which crosses east and west on Center street, while the Chicago & Northwestern Railway passes in a northwesterly and southeasterly direction adjoining the platted part on the north. At [455]*455the time of incorporation the population was two hundred forty-four, and at the general election in November, 1910, sixty-five votes were cast, and at the election to incorporate in December, 1908, fifty-five votes were cast. The assessed valuation of the unplatted real estate in 1910 was $12,875, .and of the platted real estate $28,530. The total personal property, assessed valuation, was $34,377. Eight families, consisting of thirty-four persons, resided on the unplatted part. In the village proper are located the usual quota of business houses, shops, and factories, consisting of two depots, a Woodmen hall, post office, bank, three stores, a creamery, machine shop, lumber yard, printing office, three elevators, stockyards, a high school and a graded school, with eighty pupils, and one church. The village is the center of a populous and rich farming district, and its nearest competitors for trade are the villages of Eyota, six miles to the west, and St. Charles, four miles to the east.

[0]*0

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reagan v. Beck
474 S.W.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Perkins v. Ingalsbe
347 S.W.2d 926 (Texas Supreme Court, 1961)
Grudnosky v. Bislow
88 N.W.2d 847 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44
74 N.W.2d 410 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1956)
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County
246 Minn. 96 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1956)
State Ex Rel. Northern Pump Co. v. Village of Fridley
47 N.W.2d 204 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1951)
State v. McCoy
38 N.W.2d 386 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1949)
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. So-Called Village of St. Anthony
26 N.W.2d 193 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1947)
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of Leetonia
298 N.W. 717 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
State Ex Rel. Smiley v. Holm
243 N.W. 133 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1932)
State Ex Rel. Wilkie v. Stein
52 S.W.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
State ex rel. Wilke v. Stein
36 S.W.2d 698 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1931)
State Ex Rel. Koski v. Kylmanen
226 N.W. 401 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1929)
State Ex Rel. Erickson v. Gram
210 N.W. 616 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
State ex rel. Hilton v. City of Nashwauk
186 N.W. 694 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1922)
State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of Buhl
184 N.W. 850 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1921)
State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of Kinney
178 N.W. 815 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1920)
Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co. v. Village of Kinney
262 F. 980 (D. Minnesota, 1919)
State ex rel. Smith v. Village of Gilbert
149 N.W. 951 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 N.W. 74, 113 Minn. 452, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-simpson-v-village-of-dover-minn-1911.