State ex rel. Simmons v. Judge of the Fifth District Court
This text of 23 La. Ann. 713 (State ex rel. Simmons v. Judge of the Fifth District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think the appeal asked for by the' relators should have been alloived. The judgment directed the sheriff to return to the firm of Howard & Prestons the sum of $1000 in his hands, which relators claim was collected by the sheriff for them, and should be paid to them. If this judgment he merely' interlocutory, it is one which if erroneous would be held in a legal sense to work an irreparable injury. The relators have a right therefore to submit to this court the question whether it is erroneous or not.
Mandamus made peremptory.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 La. Ann. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-simmons-v-judge-of-the-fifth-district-court-la-1871.