State ex rel. Shue v. Croft

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Shue v. Croft

11 N.E.3d 282, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1426

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 2014·No. 2014-0553·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Alternative writ granted. The following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05: The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., dissents and would grant the motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Alternative writ granted. The following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05: The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Connor, C.J., dissents and would grant the motion to dismiss.

State ex rel. Shue v. Croft, 11 N.E.3d 282, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1426 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

11 N.E.3d 282 (State ex rel. Shue v. Croft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.