State ex rel. Shropshire v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

State ex rel. Shropshire v. Mayo

68 So. 2d 393, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1755

DecidedNovember 20, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 68 So. 2d 393 (State ex rel. Shropshire v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Shropshire v. Mayo, 68 So. 2d 393, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1755 (Fla. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the report of the Honorable Claude Ogilvie, Circuit Judge, to whom this cause was referred for the purpose of taking testimony relevant to the charge of the relator that he was so greatly under the influence of narcotics at the time of his arraignment that he was wholly and completely ignorant of all the proceedings including his arraignment and plea of guilt' to charges-against him; and-upon the exceptions to the Circuit Judge’s report; and the Court having considered the report and the record in the cause and having heard argument of counsel for the relator and the respondent,

IT IS ORDERED.that the exceptions be overruled; that the report be accepted and approved; that .the.writ of habeas corpus issued 8 June, 1953, be discharged, and that the relator be remanded to the custody of the respondent.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ■ THOMAS, DREW and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the report of the Honorable Claude Ogilvie, Circuit Judge, to whom this cause was referred for the purpose of taking testimony relevant to the charge of the relator that he was so greatly under the influence of narcotics at the time of his arraignment that he was wholly and completely ignorant of all the proceedings including his arraignment and plea of guilt' to charges-against him; and-upon the exceptions to the Circuit Judge’s report; and the Court having considered the report and the record in the cause and having heard argument of counsel for the relator and the respondent,

IT IS ORDERED.that the exceptions be overruled; that the report be accepted and approved; that .the.writ of habeas corpus issued 8 June, 1953, be discharged, and that the relator be remanded to the custody of the respondent.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ■ THOMAS, DREW and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 So. 2d 393, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-shropshire-v-mayo-fla-1953.