State ex rel. Shropshire v. Judge of Fifth District Court

23 La. Ann. 491
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1871·No. No. 3339·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Howe, J.

The application for a prohibition in this case, to preserve the appellate jurisdiction of this court and the right of the relator to suspend execution pending the appeal, involves the sufficiency of the surety on the appeal bond. The bond is for $900; the surety declares he is w'orth that amount over and above his debts; and that his property consists of real estate worth $6000, encumbered for $4000. No evidence is offered to contradict these statements, and we do not see why they are not conclusive in establishing his sufficiency.

It is therefore ordered that the prohibition granted herein, be made perpetual.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Shropshire v. Judge of Fifth District Court, 23 La. Ann. 491 (La. 1871).

23 La. Ann. 491 (State ex rel. Shropshire v. Judge of Fifth District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charvanel v. Esvard
90 So. 658 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1922)
Reynolds v. Egan
47 So. 371 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)