State ex rel. Shotts v. Austin Powder Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Shotts v. Austin Powder Co.

676 N.E.2d 534, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1430

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 13, 1997

Docket96-2342

StatusPublished

This text of 676 N.E.2d 534 (State ex rel. Shotts v. Austin Powder Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Shotts v. Austin Powder Co., 676 N.E.2d 534, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1430 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 95APD12-1643. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On March 3,1997, appellants filed a reply brief that was due February 10, 1997. Rule XIV, Section 1(C) of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court prohibits the filing of a brief that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 95APD12-1643. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On March 3,1997, appellants filed a reply brief that was due February 10, 1997. Rule XIV, Section 1(C) of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court prohibits the filing of a brief that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

676 N.E.2d 534, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-shotts-v-austin-powder-co-ohio-1997.