State ex rel. Sherman v. Sargeant

105 Ohio St. 3d 1435
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 16, 2005
Docket2004-2037
StatusPublished

This text of 105 Ohio St. 3d 1435 (State ex rel. Sherman v. Sargeant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Sherman v. Sargeant, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1435 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On complaint of Robert Franklin Sherman. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., dissent and would grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 Ohio St. 3d 1435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sherman-v-sargeant-ohio-2005.