State ex rel. Shepherd v. Henson

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Shepherd v. Henson

1 N.E.3d 422, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1455

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 23, 2013

Docket2011- 1714

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.E.3d 422 (State ex rel. Shepherd v. Henson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Shepherd v. Henson, 1 N.E.3d 422, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to vacate void judgments, motion to strike James DeWeese’s response to motion to vacate and motion to declare relator a vexatious litigator, amended motion to strike motion to vacate void judgment, and amended motion to have petitioner declared a vexatious litigator. Motions denied.

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Randy Shepherd is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(B). Accordingly, it is ordered by the court that Randy Shepherd is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the clerk of this court for the court’s review.

O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent and would not find respondent to be a vexatious litigator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On motion to vacate void judgments, motion to strike James DeWeese’s response to motion to vacate and motion to declare relator a vexatious litigator, amended motion to strike motion to vacate void judgment, and amended motion to have petitioner declared a vexatious litigator. Motions denied.

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Randy Shepherd is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(B). Accordingly, it is ordered by the court that Randy Shepherd is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the clerk of this court for the court’s review.

O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., dissent and would not find respondent to be a vexatious litigator.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.E.3d 422, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-shepherd-v-henson-ohio-2013.