State ex rel. Shelton v. Board of Education

129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 157
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 26, 1934
DocketNo. 24900
StatusPublished

This text of 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 157 (State ex rel. Shelton v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Shelton v. Board of Education, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 157 (Ohio 1934).

Opinion

This matter came on for hearing upon the petition of the relator, the answer of the respondent, the evidence and the arguments of counsel.

Upon consideration whereof the court finds that the relator is an officer, that there is no evidence supporting the charges preferred against the relator, that the action of the respondent was wrongful, arbitrary, collusive, contrary to law and not in good faith, and that the relator has no other adequate remedy (Christmann v. Coleman, 117 Ohio St., 1).

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue as prayed for by the relator, commanding his restoration to the office of Superintendent of Public Schools of the city of Springfield, Ohio, and that the costs be assessed against the respondent.

Writ allowed.

Weygandt, C. J., Garver, Hart, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Williams, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Christmann v. Coleman
157 N.E. 482 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-shelton-v-board-of-education-ohio-1934.