State ex rel. Sexton v. Indus. Comm.

2000 Ohio 50, 90 Ohio St. 3d 192

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 192.]

THE STATE EX REL. SEXTON, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Sexton v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-50.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-123—Submitted September 12, 2000—Decided October 25, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD11-1492. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Reeve W. Kelsey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________