State ex rel. Sensenbrenner v. Adult Book Store
This text of 301 N.E.2d 695 (State ex rel. Sensenbrenner v. Adult Book Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tn State, ex rel. Keating, v. Vixen, ante, 215, this court held that R. C. 2905.34 and 2905.35 comport with the standards for determining obscenity enunciated in Miller v. California (1973), 37 L. Ed. 2d 419. Those statutes were applied in the initial Vixen opinion, reported in 27 Ohio St. 2d 278, in determining whether the film in question was obscene.
In like fashion, those statutes may be used in the instant appeals to determine whether the materials in question are obscene.
It is apparent that, if these causes were remanded to the Court of Common Pleas, the trier of the facts, given the standards expressed in Miller and the provisions of R. C. 2905.34 as guides for determining the issue of obscenity, could come to no other conclusion than the one reached in the first instance.
Inasmuch as “* * * we have authority to render such judgment as the lower court would now be required to render, if the cause were remanded” (State, ex rel. Keating, v. Vixen [1971], 27 Ohio St. 2d 278), we allow the motions to certify the record and affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 N.E.2d 695, 35 Ohio St. 2d 220, 64 Ohio Op. 2d 368, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sensenbrenner-v-adult-book-store-ohio-1973.