State Ex Rel. Seibels v. Curtis

93 So. 229, 18 Ala. App. 531, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 198
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 30, 1922·No. 3 Div. 426.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Under the authority of Ex parte State of Alabama, In re Stephenson, 113 Ala. 85, 21 South. 210, and State ex rel. Almon et al. v. Burke, Judge, 160 Ala. 163, 48 South. 1035, the petition filed in this court by W. T. Seibels, solicitor of the Fifteenth judicial circuit, et al., is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Seibels v. Curtis, 93 So. 229, 18 Ala. App. 531, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 198 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

93 So. 229 (State Ex Rel. Seibels v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Mullis v. Mathews
66 So. 2d 105 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1953)
State v. Howell
123 So. 275 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Cory v. State
115 So. 700 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)