State ex rel. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission

117 Ohio St. 3d 539

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 2008·No. No. 2007-0642·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., and Ronald A. Fresco, for appellant. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and William R. Creedon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Philip J. Fulton Law Office, Philip J. Fulton, and William A. Thorman III, for appellee Sue Moenter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., and Ronald A. Fresco, for appellant. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and William R. Creedon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Philip J. Fulton Law Office, Philip J. Fulton, and William A. Thorman III, for appellee Sue Moenter.

State ex rel. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission, 117 Ohio St. 3d 539 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

117 Ohio St. 3d 539 (State ex rel. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.