State ex rel. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission

117 Ohio St. 3d 539

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 16, 2008

DocketNo. 2007-0642

StatusPublished

This text of 117 Ohio St. 3d 539 (State ex rel. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission, 117 Ohio St. 3d 539 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., and Ronald A. Fresco, for appellant. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and William R. Creedon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Philip J. Fulton Law Office, Philip J. Fulton, and William A. Thorman III, for appellee Sue Moenter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., and Ronald A. Fresco, for appellant. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and William R. Creedon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Philip J. Fulton Law Office, Philip J. Fulton, and William A. Thorman III, for appellee Sue Moenter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 Ohio St. 3d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sears-roebuck-co-v-industrial-commission-ohio-2008.