State ex rel. Sealey v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 571.]
THE STATE EX REL. SEALEY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Sealey v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-19.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-1084—Submitted November 14, 2000—Decided January 17, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-588. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2001 Ohio 19 (State ex rel. Sealey v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.