State ex rel. S.D.B.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. S.D.B.

620 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2152, 1993 WL 228376

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 25, 1993

DocketNo. 93-CK-1191

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 620 So. 2d 824 (State ex rel. S.D.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. S.D.B., 620 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2152, 1993 WL 228376 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. Relator has shown her entitlement to invoke a privilege as to information communicated by her to the licensed professional counsel in court-ordered therapy. The fact that the privileged information is relevant to the termination proceeding under La.Ch.Code art. 1015(3), (4) and (5) does not remove the right to invoke the privilege, as held by the court of appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is set aside, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Granted. Relator has shown her entitlement to invoke a privilege as to information communicated by her to the licensed professional counsel in court-ordered therapy. The fact that the privileged information is relevant to the termination proceeding under La.Ch.Code art. 1015(3), (4) and (5) does not remove the right to invoke the privilege, as held by the court of appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is set aside, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2152, 1993 WL 228376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sdb-la-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack