State ex rel. Scobie v. Cass

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Scobie v. Cass

84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 14, 1911

DocketNo. 12817

StatusPublished

This text of 84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443 (State ex rel. Scobie v. Cass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Scobie v. Cass, 84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443 (Ohio 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the circuit court of Cuyahoga county having been affirmed generally by entry [444]*444of March 14, 1911, the following supplementary entry under date of March 28, 1911, was made:

■ ' The judgment of affirmance. of the'judgment of the circuit court of Cuyahoga county,, entered at page 591 of .this journal, is/based upon' the proposition that the work of ’ building the court house became and was a “proceeding” within the meaning of Section 26 of the General Code, as illustrated by the reasoning of the circuit court, in its opinion, 32 C. C, 208, and was not affected by the provision of Section 2338 of the Code.

/ .Whether the work of interior decoration was or not competitive work is not passed upon.

Spear, C. J., Davis, Spiauck, Price and, Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the circuit court of Cuyahoga county having been affirmed generally by entry [444]*444of March 14, 1911, the following supplementary entry under date of March 28, 1911, was made:

■ ' The judgment of affirmance. of the'judgment of the circuit court of Cuyahoga county,, entered at page 591 of .this journal, is/based upon' the proposition that the work of ’ building the court house became and was a “proceeding” within the meaning of Section 26 of the General Code, as illustrated by the reasoning of the circuit court, in its opinion, 32 C. C, 208, and was not affected by the provision of Section 2338 of the Code.

/ .Whether the work of interior decoration was or not competitive work is not passed upon.

Spear, C. J., Davis, Spiauck, Price and, Donahue, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-scobie-v-cass-ohio-1911.