State ex rel. Schwartz v. Brown

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 91
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 9, 1964
DocketNo. 38686
StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 91 (State ex rel. Schwartz v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Schwartz v. Brown, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 91 (Ohio 1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our statutes (1) provide that the Secretary of State “shall * * * certify to each board” of elections on the 75th day before the primary election (here February 20) the names of the state candidates to be printed on the ballots (Section 3513.05, Revised Code) and (2) contemplate that armed-service and absentee ballots for this primary should have been available by March 6, 1964 (Sections 3511.03 and 3509.03, Revised Code). Under the circumstances here, where time is such an important factor, extreme diligence and the promptest of action were required on the part of relator. The unexplained [92]*92lack of diligence on the part of relator deprives him. of the relief he seeks. State, ex rel. Winterfeld, v. Board of Elections of Lucas County, 167 Ohio St., 531; State, ex rel. Peirce, v. Board of Elections of Stark County, 168 Ohio St., 249.

The case is dismissed sua sponte.

Case dismissed.

Taft, 0. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schwartz-v-brown-ohio-1964.