Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State Ex Rel. Schunk v. Hamilton

State Ex Rel. Schunk v. Hamilton

190 N.E. 199, 127 Ohio St. 555, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 555, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 245
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1933
Docket24446
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 190 N.E. 199 (State Ex Rel. Schunk v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Schunk v. Hamilton, 190 N.E. 199, 127 Ohio St. 555, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 555, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 245 (Ohio 1933).

Opinion

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the relator for a writ of mandamus and the demurrer of the respondents thereto, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the demurrer be, and the same hereby is, sustained for the reason that a court of record speaks through its journal and its journal in this cause discloses that the cause is still pending on a rehearing; and for the further reason that a writ of mandamus does not lie where there is an adequate remedy at law to correct an erroneous judgment by proceedings in error.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hower Corp. v. Vance
59 N.E.2d 377 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1945)
State Ex Rel. Jaster v. Kautz
2 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 N.E. 199, 127 Ohio St. 555, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 555, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schunk-v-hamilton-ohio-1933.