State ex rel. Schultz v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Schultz v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

357 N.E.2d 1079, 48 Ohio St. 2d 173, 2 Ohio Op. 3d 372, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 729

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1976

DocketNo. 76-500

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 357 N.E.2d 1079 (State ex rel. Schultz v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Schultz v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections, 357 N.E.2d 1079, 48 Ohio St. 2d 173, 2 Ohio Op. 3d 372, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 729 (Ohio 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The referendum petition submitted by relators does not indicate anywhere that one of the paragraphs included in the title of the resolution, to be voted on was- hot adopted by the Olmsted Township Board of Trustees. It is apparent, therefore, that the: referendum petition does not fairly and accurately present the issues sought to be submitted to the electorate. Markus v. Bd. of Elections (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 197.

...Accordingly, the judgment of the .Court of Appeals, denying the writ of mandamus, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’NEnÍL, C. J., HERBERT, CORRIGAN, STERN, .CELEBREZZE, Stephenson and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Stephenson, J.,' of the Fourth Appellate District, fitting for IV. Brown, j. ■ . . • ‘i • ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI