State ex rel. Schultz v. Carrel

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Schultz v. Carrel

105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 351

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 29, 1921

DocketNo. 17166

StatusPublished

This text of 105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 351 (State ex rel. Schultz v. Carrel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Schultz v. Carrel, 105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 351 (Ohio 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

From a consideration of the findings of the master herein appointed, this court is of opinion that there was not a sufficient number of valid signatures attached to the various petitions to authorize the referendum sought; and a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to certify said petitions for referendum to the board of deputy state supervisors and inspectors of elections is therefore denied. *

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

From a consideration of the findings of the master herein appointed, this court is of opinion that there was not a sufficient number of valid signatures attached to the various petitions to authorize the referendum sought; and a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to certify said petitions for referendum to the board of deputy state supervisors and inspectors of elections is therefore denied. *

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schultz-v-carrel-ohio-1921.