State Ex Rel. Schuble v. Youngblood
This text of 84 N.E.2d 201 (State Ex Rel. Schuble v. Youngblood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The relator is now an inmate of the Indiana State Prison and has filed in the» Vanderburgh Circuit Court his petition pro se for writ of coram nobis seeking a new trial of the cause wherein he was sentenced for the term which he is now serving.
Relator’s petition herein is filed pro se. In this petition he asks us to compel respondent to order his return from the prison to Vanderburgh County for the purpose of attending and conducting in person the hearing on his coram nobis proceedings, in which proceedings he has refused to accept the services of the public defender.
On the authority of State ex rel. Fulton v. Schannen (1946), 224 Ind. 55, 64 N. E. 2d 798, and State ex rel. Rogers v. Youngblood, Judge (1949), 226 Ind. 299, 83 N. E. 2d 188, petition is denied.
Note.—Reported in 84 N. E. 2d 201.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 N.E.2d 201, 227 Ind. 751, 1949 Ind. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-schuble-v-youngblood-ind-1949.